The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony

Letter to the Editor: Laws exist for a reason

Editor:

I am writing in response to Nick Macey’s April 19 column regarding the drinking age. Although I believe that his arguments are valid to a certain extent, we have all heard them time and time again. So, I’d like to play devil’s advocate for just a moment.

The headline of Macey’s article is the first part of this overused, unrealistic argument I would like to address. The headline is, “Marriage OK for 18-year-olds, but not drinking and gambling?!” Marriage is not OK for 18-year olds. Simply because the law says 18-year-olds can marry doesn’t mean they should. In fact, I don’t know a single 18-year-old who should marry. I firmly believe that a key ingredient to a successful marriage is life experience, and let’s be honest-how much life experience does an 18-year old have? Macey is right-one should first legally experience a drunken night before experiencing a marriage. However, I don’t believe that means the drinking age should be lowered. Clearly the age at which marriage is legal should be raised.

Macey argues if an 18-year-old can vote for our country’s president and marry the love of his or her short little life, he or she should legally be able to consume alcohol. Perhaps the government didn’t blindly choose age 21 for the legal drinking age. Again, Macey makes a valid point in saying that alcohol legally available to 18 year-olds would become less of a novelty. However, this makes alcohol much more accessible to younger teenagers. By decreasing the drinking age, there are automatically younger children consuming alcohol more often. Is it worth it?

Macey says “[18- to 20-year olds] should not be denied the rights given to other adults simply because of their age.” Says who? Should 13-year-olds be allowed to drive a car because they are teenagers like 16-year-olds? No.

The point is simply that there are rules and laws for a reason. Although they may not seem logical at first glance to the 18 year-old who wants to get “smashed,” with a deeper, more objective look, these laws do have some validity.

Jessie Weinstein

Freshman,

Speech Communication

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy here.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *