The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues

Animal cruelty not worth it

Editor:

In her recent column (“Animal research is clearly worth it,” Dec. 1), Alicia Williams was so busy fearmongering over peaceful animal rights activists that many could’ve easily missed her weak arguments in defense of animal experimentation.

Her primary authority for her claims is U vice president of research, Tom Parks, who personally benefits from the animal research industry. Clearly, Parks and the vivisectors he speaks for have a vested interest in the matter. This is akin to asking Exxon about the harms and benefits of offshore drilling. Thus it should be no surprise that much of what she presented as fact in her column is actually fiction.

First, the numbers of animals used in research has continually climbed over the last few decades, not declined.

Second, it can be easily demonstrated that what drives the engine of animal research, even here at the U, is not scientific ingenuity, but moneymaking.

And finally, the dogs, cats and monkeys here at the U and elsewhere in the country suffer absolutely miserable lives in labs. They live in environmentally deprived conditions and are forced to undergo experiments that we have deemed too cruel and unusual to be carried out on consenting humans. The long history of cruelty inside vivisection labs is well-documented, as is the history of the efforts of the labs to maximize secrecy and avoid public scrutiny.

Jeremy Beckham,
Senior, History and Philosophy

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy at https://dailyutahchronicle.com/comment-faqs/.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *