Soter: Bringing Gun Courses into Schools Would Be Pure Lunacy
March 2, 2021
I believe all social justice problems could be solved by good education. That’s why I worked as a peer educator for Planned Parenthood for three years. Unfortunately, though, teaching sex education wasn’t the transformative experience I had expected. Instead of changing lives through inclusive, comprehensive and raw conversations, I left each class astonished and saddened by the questions I couldn’t answer and the topics I couldn’t cover because of the abstinence-based curriculum set in place by Utah’s conservative legislature — or rather, Utah’s selectively conservative legislature. “Conservative” feels like the wrong word to describe their ridiculously permissive, comically hypocritical and flat-out dangerous stance on firearm education in schools. That stance was confirmed by lawmakers’ recent overwhelming support of H.B. 258, also known as “Firearm Safety in Schools.”
The bill, which is sponsored by Rep. Rex P. Shipp, would fund a pilot program in which selected school districts would offer an optional course in firearm safety that would last one semester and earn students a half credit in physical education. This course would be taught in high school settings using replica guns. H.B. 258 has already passed a House Committee 6-3.
That’s a big problem. Barbara Gentry, a board member of the Gun Violence Prevention Center of Utah, said in an email interview, “H.B. 258 is a political and financial support vehicle for promoting the use of guns. H.B. 258 will provide taxpayer dollars to support training for an activity that is already heavily supported by corporate interests and gun rights groups.” She’s right. The economic influx the gun industry will experience if this bill passes is undeniable, and second amendment-loving lawmakers like Shipp know that. No matter your opinion on the gun debate, you must recognize that the Utah legislature is taking advantage of both taxpayers and students by trying to get this bill passed. It’s unethical and wildly concerning.
The gun safety course created by H.B. 258 would touch on suicide prevention — but it could also perpetuate gun violence by sending the message that teenagers should be allowed to use these deadly weapons. Shipp said in the Deseret News, “It also has suicide prevention involved in there because if somebody comes upon a firearm not understanding how to safely handle it, that could create a problem with potentially having accidents and so forth.” But this explanation, like the language of H.B. 258, provides no clarification as to how the course would prevent suicide. If anything, it would facilitate it in a state with already-high rates of mental illness and suicide among minors.
Furthermore, the bill appoints gun experts without teaching licenses as the educators of the course. Gentry wrote of this point, “At the first hearing for this bill, it was suggested that local gun range instructors could teach the course. If there is a demand for a course to get a gun permit, why does the private sector not step up and provide this service?” Schools are not the right setting for firearm safety courses — especially given the gun violence America sees so often in schools.
In an interview with the co-directors of March for our Lives Utah, Tory Peters and Katie Kern, they echoed Gentry’s sentiments. Kern said, “[This bill] is pretty ironic and quite scary. I understand maybe adult use, that’s different, but for kids, it’s just — wow.” Peters added, “There’s a lot of worry around drills about shootings because of the trauma that they can cause students and that fear, and it’s widely accepted that they’re not great for students because of that fear. I think that teaching students how to use guns and having that be something that their fellow students know is going to perpetuate that fear. It’s not conducive to a learning environment, especially when these students can learn about how to use a gun outside of school. School should be a place for learning more academic subjects.”
Kern and Peters had several ideas, though, for legislation that could benefit students, like providing more counselors for students in public schools or having a mental health class for students. Peters said, “If there is going to be a class teaching students how to use guns, there should be a class about mental health. Or maybe this class should be about mental health and how guns relate to it.”
Gentry agreed that there are much more productive changes that lawmakers can and should facilitate to mitigate gun violence among Utah minors. Instead of passing H.B. 258, Gentry wrote, “Legislators should be putting into effect these laws: Universal background checks which close the gun show loophole that allows anyone to buy a gun without a background check, ERPO (extreme risk protective order) which allows concerned individuals to follow a legal process to remove guns from individuals exhibiting unstable behaviors that put themselves or others at risk, and safe storage bills that provide information and gun locks for those that have unsecured guns.”
I do believe that firearm safety, just like safe sex practices, is important to know. But it shouldn’t be taught as a way to encourage students to use guns. Instead, Utah schools should teach teenagers about the devastating impact guns can have if not used wisely — and state leaders should use other strategies to protect students from gun violence, self-inflicted or otherwise.
Derek Anderson • Mar 5, 2021 at 2:57 pm
Your double standard on the topics of sex education and gun education is quite laughable.
You state that you were frustrated by an “abstinence based-curriculum” in sex ed, which is understandable. I agree with you, abstinence-based curriculum will never answer the questions that really need to be answered. It could even promote further misunderstanding and ignorance, which is exactly what we need to avoid; not only in sex education, but also in gun education.
The very best thing you can do to be safe with both sex and guns, is to educate yourself. Guns will never go away, just like sex will never go away, so the best thing we can do for future generations is to educate them as best we can in both gun safety and safe sex.
Daniel Wells • Mar 3, 2021 at 8:55 am
I lost a few brain cells reading this article. In no particular order:
1) There is no gun show loophole. That is a fact. Has the author ever even been to a gun show? Half the time they won’t even sell you ammo without a concealed permit or running a background check – something that is not required.
2) There is already a universal background check system for any sale from a gun dealer. Go to a gun store. Try to buy a gun. They won’t sell you one without a background check.
3) ERPOs are just a flavor of Red Flag Laws – which are unconstitutional and absolutely should not be implemented.
4) Safe storage bills that PROVIDE storage to those that need it was the first alright suggestion I heard.
5) Most importantly, almost the entire argument against having this sort of course stems from people’s “feeling” and “fear” about what this could cause in adolescents, without any factual supporting evidence. Someone’s fear about what could happen, without supporting evidence that it could happen, is absolutely meaningless. Your absolute horrific bias is showing when you only present the ‘what-ifs’ on the worst-case scenario side of potential consequences, and not most-likely-scenario or best-case scenario (see the comment on suicide prevention). This is literal fear-mongering. At least make your argument from some sort of informed stance – like the age argument, since adolescents cannot legally possess guns.
John Hedberg • Mar 2, 2021 at 8:35 pm
As you say yourself, isn’t your argument the very argument used against teaching real sex education in schools? “It might encourage reckless behavior”? Does a driving instructor need an education degree? Thea, you sound like you care about people, and I share that, but teaching safe behavior in an age where guns (like sex) are now part of the culture seems like prudence in both cases, along with mental health in both cases, since STD’s and unexpected pregnancy can also cause lifelong health issues.
The more education (sex, guns, mental health, finances, first aid, nutrition, humanity, etc), the better. These days, kids slay each their with their phones!
With Love, J
Please, if you’d like to respond, I’d love to hear what you think. email
Reese WIlson • Mar 2, 2021 at 8:28 pm
I completely disagree with almost everything you said. Gun safety is extremely important for anyone interested in firearms. Hunter safety classes can be taken at a very young age and are paramount to children’s life and safety while operating firearms. Ive shot guns since i was able to walk and because i know how to do it safetly, i, as well as my peers feel safer when firearms are present. You mention you are worried about an increase in gun sales, but i think that is just awesome, especially during times when poilce are getting defunded, rioting is going on, and the government told us we cant leave our homes, all on top of biden trying to ban most firearms