Cowley: Boycott Greenwashing
May 27, 2022
The public is more environmentally conscious than ever before. According to data collected by Gallup, four out of 10 Americans today worry “a great deal” about the environment. As a result, more people are trying to live sustainably. Reusable cups, bags and utensils continue to become more and more common.
Of course, companies are quick to capitalize on the growing popularity of sustainable practices. Anytime I go shopping, I see an increasing number of products promoted as sustainable and eco-friendly. But in reality, these products aren’t any better than their normal counterparts.
By greenwashing products to make them seem more environmentally friendly, brands deceive consumers and avoid taking accountability for their unsustainable practices. We as consumers need to take action and boycott these products.
The Industries at Fault
Greenwashing occurs when a company markets a product as being better for the environment than it actually is. While greenwashing has existed since people began having concerns about the environment, the practice has ramped up in recent years. Gas companies are notorious for their greenwashing techniques. Companies such as Exxon, Shell and Chevron use terms such as “net-zero emissions” and “low carbon.” In reality, gas and oil companies are responsible for 10% of all worldwide carbon emissions. There is no such thing as sustainable gas or oil. Gas and oil companies are so deceptive about their business practices that many people are suing them for misleading the public — and rightfully so. However, gas and oil aren’t the only industries that greenwash.
The fashion industry is the third largest polluting industry in the world, only after construction and the food industry. Fast fashion (cheap, trendy clothing made quickly to meet consumer demand) is terrible for the environment. Fast fashion companies such as Zara, Shein and H&M commonly use greenwashing terms including “sustainability commitments” and “green.” These phrases don’t mean anything legally. The recycling programs set up by fast fashion companies don’t even curb all the waste that the industry produces. These programs often end up throwing away most of the garments put into them. Only 5% to 10% of the clothes sent to H&M’s garment recycling program are made into new clothes. On top of that, H&M touts their clothes as being made from recycled materials. In actuality, roughly .7% of the fiber in their garments comes from recycling.
Diverting Blame and Avoiding Accountability
Greenwashing actively misleads consumers about the environmental impacts of the products they’re consuming, pushing the blame for pollution from the company to the consumer. Forty percent of the sustainable claims or pledges made by companies are misleading in some capacity. Misled, but well-meaning, consumers are robbed of actually decreasing their carbon footprints. Meanwhile, this greenwashing makes brands look more sustainable.
Upholding such false reputations allows brands to avoid making any actual, eco-friendly, changes to their production processes. Many of the current sustainability initiatives from companies are only PR moves. While programs exist to certify green practices such as the B Corp certification, they’re imperfect. A B Corp certification does not automatically make for a good company.
Acting as Consumers
While greenwashing remains everywhere, there are things we can do as consumers to boycott it. Being more conscientious about what you buy is a great way to avoid falling for greenwashing. Make sure to thoroughly look into a brand before making your purchases. In depth research can show us how sustainable a brand really is. There are tons of helpful websites online that rate the sustainability of different brands. One such website is goodonyou.eco, which rates brands on cost and sustainability. Websites like this make it much easier to make more environmentally friendly choices when it comes to the products we buy.
Another thing I’ve been doing to be a more conscientious consumer is trying to limit my purchasing all together. Buying sparingly is one of the better ways to limit your carbon footprint, despite what greenwashed marketing might tell you.
As the public becomes more concerned about the environment, companies are quick to capitalize on that concern. Part of reducing your carbon footprint is being a more conscientious consumer. Remaining aware of our individual impacts and boycotting damaging brands helps encourage change. Speak with your wallet, and don’t stand for deceptive marketing.
John Hedberg • May 27, 2022 at 5:34 pm
Solar and wind power only produce electricity when the sun shines and the wind blows, and technology hasn’t found a way to store that power yet, so it’s called intermittent: it’s not really very helpful to the environment, since using batteries to store electrical power means you have to create carbon to create the batteries, then create carbon to clean up the dead batteries when they die. (Oops!)
This TEDx Talk was a surprise, too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-yALPEpV4w
Converting intermittent green power to hydrogen using versions of electrolysis is currently inefficient and expensive, but hydrogen can be used as a clean power source with zero emissions if we can find the right technology.
As far as I know, there is no plan that even pretends to stop global warming. Why not start thinking long term, like planting trees and other carbon-capture botany in the permafrost lands presently turning green, up North? Why not start now, building sustainable communities in large agrarian zones in Canada, Russia, and other places turning green? We could definitely clean up after ourselves in the oceans and other wilderness areas, all of which support chlorophyll carbon capture as well as habitat for wildlife.
Strangely, maybe the best thing we can do is abandon city life and return to a more natural lifestyle closer to the food we grow, with clothes made of natural fibers, and practices that don’t rely on the constant use of chemicals? We shouldn’t need landfills, not if we’re clever enough to learn from the past proactively. Our bodies and minds evolved to mesh with our ecology. Quite possible, the closer we learn to mesh with that ecology, the healthier and happier we’ll be as evolved beings who’ve learned to maximize that relationship through science and love.
Best Regards,
J Hedberg