Cushman: We Need to Talk About Alt-Right Radicalization of Young Women
September 15, 2022
In 2008, white nationalist Richard Spencer coined the term “alt-right,” and in recent years, the discourse of it has become mainstream. It largely centers on the radicalization of young boys and men via misogynistic podcasts, the “incel” (involuntary celibate) community and social media algorithms promoting alt-right ideas. Articles talk about the radicalization of “an aimless young man — usually white, frequently interested in video games,” or “male bonding.”
These terms and articles paint radicalization as a male-only issue. However, men are not the only ones being targeted and radicalized by the alt-right. Women are also subjected to alt-right radicalization — it just receives less attention.
Radicalized young white women might be less visible because they appear less insidious, posting baking or makeup tutorials rather than carrying tiki torches through the streets of Charlottesville. Nonetheless, the radicalization of young women spreads violent and racist rhetoric further, making it just as dangerous as male radicalization. It’s important that we recognize and combat this radicalization as much as we do the radicalization of men.
The Radicalization of Young White Women
For young men, radicalization often starts with them looking for like-minded friends online, leading them to incel, pickup artist or gaming communities. These spaces for male friendship lead to radicalization as conversations shift from men worrying about relationships and fulfillment to fear of the changing position of white men in a society where women and minorities are becoming more empowered.
Alt-right pipelines that target young women often look much different and less blatantly misogynistic. Nonetheless, online communities that radicalize young women also articulate fears of the changing position of women, especially white women, in society. For instance, young women looking to connect with more traditional femininity might stumble on the “tradwife” community. Short for “traditional wife,” “tradwife” refers to women who believe in traditional wife and mother roles, usually idealizing the 1950s housewife.
The tradwife lifestyle appeals to young women dissatisfied and frustrated with modern life, the competitive job market, housing crisis and costs of living. That frustration can lead to a rose-tinted perspective of the past, when women could have a family and nice home with just their husband’s income.
As those young women engage with online tradwife communities, they become exposed to white nationalist rhetoric and terms pushed by notable tradwives. Utah’s own Ayla Stewart, or Wife With a Purpose, often talks about preserving white heritage, and once issued a “white baby challenge” encouraging her supporters to have as many white babies as possible.
Susceptibility of Utah Women
Utah is no stranger to alt-right rhetoric. DezNat, a social media tag short for Deseret Nation and used by some Utah Mormons, has been associated with the alt-right. But Utah’s women could be more susceptible to online radicalization due to a much larger cultural phenomenon: Utah’s rampant sexism.
Studies consistently rank Utah as one of the worst states for women’s equality, as well as one of the most sexist states. Cultural and religious norms prioritize women as homemakers, wives and mothers. One study from USU found that sexist comments stereotyping and undervaluing women are commonplace in Utah. Utah women hear sexist commentary at work, school and church. It invades nearly every part of our lives.
When women grow up in sexist environments, it perpetuates internalized misogyny, a phenomenon where women view themselves and other women from a sexist perspective. In Utah, internalized misogyny thrives. In fact, Utah is in a minority of states where women responded to sexist statements in a nationwide questionnaire with more sexism than men.
While alt-right pipelines geared toward women lack the blatant misogyny of the incel or pickup artist communities, they still depend on and perpetuate sexist beliefs about women. When Utah tells women that their value comes from traditional gender roles and promotes sexist ideologies, we internalize those beliefs and are susceptible to alt-right pipelines.
We Must Address the Radicalization of Young Women
Online articles emphasize the importance of talking about the radicalization of young men. They turn radicalization into an issue solely facing today’s male youth, rather than youth as a whole. We must have conversations about the radicalization of young white women to confront racist and misogynistic ideas and identify the dog whistles young women should look out for online. Without addressing the full picture of white nationalist radicalization, we can’t combat it and we can’t teach people to avoid it.
Lyndsay Ricks • Sep 22, 2022 at 5:20 pm
I’m glad somebody is trying to bring some attention to this — it really is a major growing problem that warrants much more analysis in the media than it’s gotten. I would like to point out that “DezNat” typically stands for Deseret *nationalist* (or nationalism depending on context), not *nation* — it’s more insidious than the latter makes it sound.
John Hedberg • Sep 23, 2022 at 7:36 pm
Wow, I think if it’s such a “major growing problem”, you should tell us the story of anyone you actually know who’s been affected by it, so we know this isn’t just some intolerant, alt-Left hate narrative directed at diverse innocent groups of people who are no worse in their character or behaviors than you… and maybe not as bad (all of us being equal).
DezNat sounds an awful lot like your version of the N-word, don’t you think? A lot of women grow up in Marxist environments, too, and they’re just as capable of buying deeply into false narratives as any other people (Clearly?)
Cheers, with Love,
J Hedberg
John Hedberg • Sep 18, 2022 at 2:08 pm
Marxism is stridently anti-‘nuclear family’, because any bond that threatens their hold on your allegiance to them is considered a threat, and there are few ties stronger than family. It’s the same reason they try to destroy religion: allegiance to God is the same as “terrorism” to them, since having principles and Love which threaten their lying hypocritical political narratives to maintain power, by definition, make you an “extremist”, “alt-right”, “anti-Democracy”, and a “violent insurgent”. These “threats to the rest of us must be stamped out”! Uh-huh! 😋
Have you never seen any interviews with people who’ve escaped Marxist countries? [Lily Tang Williams from China, Yeonmi Park from North Korea, Xi Van Fleet from China, refugees from Venezuela, Soviet Europe, Cuba, the list is long… Or even the film “The Lives of Others” about life under the Stasi secret police in the “German Democratic Republic”: former East Germany called itself “democratic” while it imprisoned, tortured, and shot anyone with diverse views!]
So, your Marxist propaganda app is now equating parenthood and marriage as “alt-right” and “trad-wife extremism”? Lol
[Re-Tweet]
I’m not Mormon, but even I know, from hanging around Mormon singles, that their leaders advise women to get as much education as they can (including a bachelor’s degree, at a minimum), but when they decide to begin having children, those leaders advise focusing on parenting, if circumstances permit.
Aside from the traditional elements, I can see why. Kids who grow up in a 2-parent home where they get focused attention tend to mature more quickly, do better at school, stay out of trouble and out of prison, and tend to be more successful at life in general than kids who don’t. The statistics are there. It doesn’t have to be the mother that stays home, and I know of Mormon families where it’s the wife who works, but the focus on quality time toward the children is hugely beneficial to the children (and to society), and that’s the scientific reason that backs up the traditional approach.
I have sisters who are hugely successful outside the home, including 2 business owners, one with a STEM doctorate. However, that 2-parent focus on the best interests of children is something they believe in, since we grew up without that, and we know the difference first-hand of going without a lot of things other families’ children take for granted. As children, it is so much harder!
My parents’ families (both sides) are Christian, but also big believers in education, and for 75 years or more, women on both sides have done whatever they pleased. Those who chose to went to college. Those who chose not to weren’t judged as being lesser, because their focus was just as important, in human terms and in personal terms. Not judging others used to be a core Liberal principle, and whatever anyone chooses to pursue, who are we to say they’re wrong as diverse individuals who know themselves, with Love?
If women spend less time in the outside workforce, there’s nothing wrong with that, just like there’s nothing wrong with choosing to be a combat pilot or an astronaut. If you respect life and you respect choice, you should be fine, either way.
If people have different values, or come from a different culture, aren’t we being a little bit ignorant assuming that we know better about their choices than they do? What if it turns out that their culture is actually the better choice, for them?
Just a thought to consider.
Equal opportunity appears to be the norm, even here in Utah, so assuming everyone else’s diverse life outlook is “behind” your own may be presumptuous and a little bit arrogant. How can you be “inclusive” of someone whom you disrespect so clearly?
Best Regards, with Love,
J Hedberg
John Hedberg • Sep 15, 2022 at 5:48 pm
So, parenthood is now misogyny?
This may surprise you: some women (and ex-incels of all backgrounds) really like their children. Astonishingly, it’s not a racial characteristic… at all.
It sounds like your propaganda apps now label anyone who disagrees with their Marxist ideology as “radicalized” or “racist”, when the reality is that you’ve shown your complete lack of respect for diversity, equality, and inclusion, your utter hypocrisy when it comes to compassion for anyone else and their feelings, plus a good chunk of your own misandry. If other human beings show any diversity from your own prejudices, you demonize them, dehumanize them, and falsely accuse them of violence or crimes for which they’re innocent, but which you clearly are not.
I guess it’s good to know that anyone with diverse opinions is now automatically stereotyped as “racist”, “misogynistic”, and a dangerous “radical”, simply for having diverse opinions or believing in Love and family.
It sounds like “We must address the radicalization & susceptibility” of young college women who write for Marxist university publications, who clearly don’t listen to the feelings, or bother to understand the real values & principles, of the people they both preach to and look down on with contempt in their writing.
Has someone coined the term “alt-Left” yet? How about just “self-righteous intolerant dehumanizing a-holes”? 😂
Best Regards, with Love,
J Hedberg