The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
Print Issues

Letter to the Editor

By Rob Sivulka, Ph.D. student, Philosophy


I think that Jared Whitley, in his Oct. 23 feature column titled “Fruit Faith: Science and Religion Can Mix,” made a good point of science resting on its own faith. It has assumptions that it takes for granted just as theology does.

I also don’t accept the separation between science and religion. Indeed, many scientists throughout history, and even today, understand the concept of God as an explanatory hypothesis in terms of an inference to the best explanation.

It works similarly to the acceptance of other theoretical entities (e.g., quarks, electrons, etc.).

The problem comes in the limitation of the design argument. By itself, it only gives you at best an architect within the universe, and this is quite in keeping with your Church of Jesus Christ of Later-day Saints presupposition.

Giving an explanation to these questions from a classical theistic view goes far beyond the LDS view of God being a man by nature who became exalted to His divine office.

An explanation of the former view yields a Creator with a completely different nature (not merely an office or function).

This Being would have to be truly Almighty, truly unique and in need of nothing, outside of the entire spatial and temporal universe. This being would have to be more than the architect of truth for the particular worlds that He creates within an already existing universe, but actually the source of all truth for literally all creation.

Rob Sivulka, Ph.D. student, Philosophy

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

We welcome feedback and dialogue from our community. However, when necessary, The Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to remove user comments. Posts may be removed for any of the following reasons: • Comments on a post that do not relate to the subject matter of the story • The use of obscene, threatening, defamatory, or harassing language • Comments advocating illegal activity • Posts violating copyrights or trademarks • Advertisement or promotion of commercial products, services, entities, or individuals • Duplicative comments by the same user. In the case of identical comments only the first submission will be posted. Users who habitually post comments or content that must be removed can be blocked from the comment section.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *