The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
Print Issues

Britain Plans to Back U.S. Policy Toward Iraq

COLLEGE STATION, Texas?British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in the strongest signal yet that he would back U.S. military action against Iraq, said Sunday that Saddam Hussein must allow weapons inspectors into his country “any time, any place the international community demands” or face consequences.

Blair, ending a weekend of talks with President Bush, urged the international community to confront terrorist regimes with military force if necessary?then called Saddam a brutal leader who must be dealt with. He stopped just short of specifically threatening military action against Iraq.

“The regime of Saddam is detestable,” the prime minister told more than 1,000 people at the presidential library of Bush’s father, the 41st president. The elder Bush, who introduced Blair, pushed back Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait, but was criticized for ending the Persian Gulf War with Saddam still in power.

Blair’s aides said the Iraq remarks were a last-minute addition to his speech, drafted Saturday night and Sunday morning while the prime minister visited Bush at the president’s nearby ranch. The strong language, coming at a time when Blair is under pressure in Britain to distance himself from Bush’s war talk, was viewed by White House aides as needed reaffirmation of the close U.S.-British alliance against terrorism.

Bush repeatedly says all options are on the table for dealing with Saddam, a characterization that aides say includes possible military action.

The president has embraced a policy initiated under President Clinton that calls for a “regime change,” or Saddam’s ouster. Bush calls the Iraqi leader a threat to the world, believing Iraq produces weapons of mass destruction that could be used by Saddam’s terrorist allies.

Blair, talking broadly about his approach to fighting terrorism, not just Iraq, said, “If necessary, the action should be military and again, if necessary and justified, it should involve regime change.”

He quickly followed the general warning with a specific one to Saddam: “He has to let the inspectors back in?anyone, any time, any place the international community demands.” Saddam has blocked the promised U.N. inspections.

“To allow weapons of mass destruction to be developed by a state like Iraq … would be grossly to ignore the lessons of Sept. 11, and we will not do it,” he said.

Blair suggested that any action against Saddam will not occur right away.

“We will proceed, as we did after Sept. 11, in a calm, measured, sensible but firm way,” he said.

Like Bush, the prime minister said terrorism can be curbed not just by military action, but also by cutting off financing to groups such as al Qaeda. Military action is not the only option for Saddam; he could be undercut by diplomatic pressure or covert backing of internal opponents, U.S. officials say.

Urging world leaders to stand ready against terror, he said: “We cannot, of course, intervene in all cases… but where countries are engaged in terror or the (weapons of mass destruction) business, we should not shirk from confronting them,” he said.

He said nations such as Syria, Iran and North Korea still can change enough to avoid retribution. But he seemed to hold out little hope for Iraq.

Bush has grouped Iran, Iraq and North Korea in an “axis of evil.”

Blair spent parts of three days on Bush’s Crawford, Texas, ranch to discuss Iraq and the mounting crisis in the Middle East. At the Bush library, Blair urged the Saudis to put in the form of a U.N. resolution its proposal to offer Israel “normal relations” in exchange for a full withdrawal from Arab lands held since 1967.

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

We welcome feedback and dialogue from our community. However, when necessary, The Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to remove user comments. Posts may be removed for any of the following reasons: • Comments on a post that do not relate to the subject matter of the story • The use of obscene, threatening, defamatory, or harassing language • Comments advocating illegal activity • Posts violating copyrights or trademarks • Advertisement or promotion of commercial products, services, entities, or individuals • Duplicative comments by the same user. In the case of identical comments only the first submission will be posted. Users who habitually post comments or content that must be removed can be blocked from the comment section.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *