The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues

Candidates debate fundamental difference

Tuesday’s Student Alumni Association debate revealed a fundamental difference in the philosophies of the two parties, which may end up making or breaking their campaign efforts.

The distinction of opinion between the Grassroots and RE: parties seems to be whether or not a “niche,” as Grassroots describes it, is something the future Associated Students of the University of Utah officers should endeavor to create for every student.

“It’s all about the people…They need to have a place where they have a sense of belonging,” said Grassroots vice-presidential candidate Bobby Harrington.

“We’re all Utes.”

RE: Party vice presidential candidate Ali Hasnain, a former news editor for The Daily Utah Chronicle, doesn’t see eye-to-eye with that statement.

“Frankly speaking, we are on a commuter campus. Not everyone has the ability to find a niche [or] the capacity to get involved,” Hasnain said.

Hasnain’s counterpart, Chris Carlston, added that he felt people knew who they were and that it wasn’t necessary to “baby” them into getting involved on campus.

In response, Grassroots presidential candidate Alex Lowe told a personal story about being “in the corner” all by himself at a house on Greek Row during Rush Week. He argued that it’s human nature for people to want to feel like they belong.

“Students want to get involved, they just need that help. That’s what makes the difference-we’re going after them,” Lowe said.

The Grassroots Party argued that its “specific and practical approach” to ensuring that all students one way or another find a “sense of belonging” is what sets it apart.

However, the RE: Party said it was its own ability to come together and represent, despite differences in religion, culture and ethnicity.

“We are different folks…we feel that is so important…to bridge the cultural gaps. We are the most experienced and valuable candidates because of it,” Carlston said.

Carlston is a white, Latter day Saint returned missionary.

Hasnain is a practicing Muslim from India.

Their senior class presidential candidate, Sara Hogan, was raised by interracial parents with Baptist and LDS beliefs.

In discussing what separates them from their opponents, candidates have kept insults to a minimum, throwing more compliments than mud.

They exchange friendly handshakes and comments after every debate.

Both sides agree it has been a clean race.

Candidates also had the chance to disclose how they felt about some personal aspects of their lives, which included their thoughts on campus romance.

Besides catching up on some sleep lost due to campaigning, Lowe will “hopefully hang out with a female” during spring break.

Harrington divulged that his quest for romance was one of the big motivators for initially getting involved on campus and confessed that he cried during “Seabiscuit.”

Hasnain’s comment on campus romance:

“Oh man, it’s hard.”

Grassroots senior class presidential candidate Jessica Rogers equates her campaigning with the “Eye of the Tiger” song, Carlston loves Bollywood movies and Hogan has a closet obsession with Elton John.

At the end of the debate, the moderator challenged the six candidates’ knowledge of the school song.

Though they were off-key throughout their performances, all of them knew almost every word.

[email protected]

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy at https://dailyutahchronicle.com/comment-faqs/.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *