The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony

Pre-meds angry at U enrollment process

Pre-med students applying at the U School of Medicine can expect to wait almost a year before they hear back from the U.

Applications for the School of Medicine’s 2004-05 school year were accepted from June to October 2003.

Most students applying did not hear back from the U until this month, the latest the U can accept students.

Student Kim Moyle compared the U’s enrollment process to putting all the applications in a hat and randomly drawing them out.

“[The U’s enrollment process] doesn’t make sense,” she said.

U student Tyler Gasser, who has a 3.71 GPA and who received a 31 on the MCAT, waited six months after his interview to hear back from the U.

“The U is not anything like typical rolling admissions,” Gasser said.

According to the American Medical College Application Service, the rolling admissions policy is where qualified applicants are interviewed and offered acceptances as soon as the school receives their application.

In Gasser’s interview, the U committee told him that they would get back to him with an acceptance or denial in 6 to 8 weeks.

Six months later, he received his denial letter.

In 2003, the state Legislature followed up on an audit conducted at the medical school regarding a more consistent process for evaluating students’ applications.

The U had a more consistent process, but concerns over the school’s rate of minority and female applicants accepted into the program remained.

In 2003, 60 percent of the female applicants were accepted, compared with 26 percent of male applicants.

About 48 percent of minority applicants were granted admission. Gasser said that race and gender have a serious contributing factor to the U’s enrollment. “The selection committee should not be replaced, but big changes should be made,” Gasser said.

Student Alex Larson, who has a 3.9 GPA and a scored a 33 on the MCAT, was denied five months after his interview.

“The overall process was comparable compared to other universities,” Larson said. “No method can be found [in the enrollment process]. It’s impossible to see any pattern or process,” he said.

Student Mike Shirley said the length of time the U took to get back to him made it very difficult to plan for next fall.

[email protected]

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy here.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *