The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues

Sewell: Good riddance Buckley

By James Sewell

Last week, William F. Buckley Jr., the intellectual founder of modern conservatism and a prescriptive grammarian if there ever was one, passed away after a lifetime of provocative and at times, persuasive debate over the ideological direction of our country. His rhetorical flourish and rapier wit were the boon and bane of entire generations, though probably unknown to most under 30.

News of his passing spread through the traditional grapevine and into more modern day media spheres such as YouTube, which had a number of Buckley-related videos, including clips from a debate with Noam Chomsky, himself an erudite political observer, and a decidedly non-prescriptive grammarian to boot.

As a student of linguistics, I cannot help but stand in awe and admiration for Chomsky, so perhaps my view of the debate is somewhat skewed, but my impression of Buckley during that performance was that he was outmatched intellectually and had to resort to rhetorical tactics like ending a round of debate he was losing by signaling for it to end just as soon as he got one last verbal jab in, which was often devastating. Buckley was all-too-capable of doing so since his forum was “Firing Line,” the show he ran for about three decades. He was the original thinking man’s Bill O’Reilly.

Such tactics, retreats from sophistication to sophistry, cannot cover his support of McCarthyism or his lack of support for the Civil Rights movement. Although he certainly did not support the foreign policy of W’s administration and spoke out against it, it’s a good deed that came a day late and a dollar short.

His strangely accented speech, which seemed more than halfway to the Queen’s English, masked a deeper prejudice against the masses and his apathy toward the common man. Above all, he relished the fame, celebrity and wealth, which allowed him to relax in sybaritic comfort aboard his yacht (he was an accomplished sailor), rubbing elbows with fellow men and women of privilege and prestige and proclaiming with great flair and wit the axioms of conservative ideology.

It is considered uncouth to speak ill of the dead, but false idolatry is no less a sin. He was no war criminal and maybe easy to like in old age, sharing the nickname Duckie with his wife Pat. But his legacy must acknowledge that certain positions he took, such as the aforementioned support for McCarthy, did not age well, nor is it easy to conjure cogent arguments to support such positions.

To be sure, he possessed a formidable mind and he almost single-handedly bestowed credibility on conservative values and revived the movement from its deathbed. He didn’t descend to the modern-day depths of vicious talk-radio reactionaries. He produced a son, Christopher, who has himself earned a reputation as a writer and was a family man.

Aside from the aphorisms, affections and affectations, we are faced with the facts: he supported bad policies and failed to support good ones. While a legion of Tucker Carlson clones mourn the passing of the intellectual giant of the Right, the rest of us should take a less somber and more sober perspective.

And so sails the good ship William F. Buckley Jr. May he rest in peace.

[email protected]

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy at https://dailyutahchronicle.com/comment-faqs/.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *