Impeachment Process begins for ASUU Senator
August 30, 2020
After the July 16 Associated Students of the University of Utah Senate meeting which discussed Joint Resolution 2: A Resolution in Support of the Black Student Union at the University of Utah — Sen. Tiffany Chan and Sen. Jessica Wojciechowski were contacted by students expressing discomfort because of Sen. Seodam Kwak’s behavior in the meeting.
Due to constituent outreach, Chan and Wojciechowski began to draft articles of impeachment, which will be published at a later date.
“A lot of the motivation behind the impeachment is because constituents have come to us and it’s our responsibility to listen to those constituents and also do what we believe is right for the student body,” Chan said.
The meeting, which was covered in an earlier article, left Chan and Wojciechowski “really concerned.”
“Just hearing our students say the same thing really confirmed to us what our next action items needed to be,” Wojciechowski said.
Impeachment for senators is a two-step process outlined in the ASUU constitution — the Redbook. First, articles of impeachment must be written and then passed by the Senate with a two-thirds majority. If the majority is reached the issue goes to trial by assembly. There, a two-thirds majority vote is needed to impeach.
If found guilty, Kwak will be removed from office immediately and will no longer be able to hold an ASUU government position for the rest of the academic year.
Wojciechowski said there was “a lot of really inappropriate behavior exhibited by Sen. Kwak” during the meeting on July 16th. Wojciechowski also said she reached out to “those who were directly impacted” by the meeting’s proceedings and those individuals “expressed the importance of wanting [Sen. Kwak] removed from office.”
“I think most people in ASUU want ASUU to be a safe space for everyone and ASUU is always talking about [how] we’re a safe space for people and the actions exhibited by Sen. Kwak in the last meeting and a few other meetings have diminished that safe space,” Wojciechowski said. “I think that the entire articles of impeachment are kind of based around the idea of like, we need [the] Senate to be a safe space for senators, for students, for organizations and a lot of students… we can see aren’t feeling that safe space.”
Both Chan and Wojciechowski said they would reserve personal opinions about whether or not impeachment is necessary for a later time in order to write the articles without external influence or bias.
“A lot of the things in the articles are based off the Constitution,” Wojciechowski said. “All in all, that’s what we’re going off of here — not only Redbook but also speaking on behalf of our students and their concerns.”
When the meeting finished, Kwak said he sat down with Chan and apologized for interrupting— which “is a clear violation of Robert’s Rules.” Kwak said he reached out to apologize to the Black Student Union and received no response.
Kwak said he felt he was misrepresented in the meeting.
“During that meeting, I was painted as a racist. I was painted as someone who is making it an unsafe space, and if the Black Student Union felt that way— clearly I apologize. I’m not here to make anyone feel attacked. I’m here to just do my job. I feel like my good intentions were very misrepresented,” he said.
Kwak served as Attorney General last year and oversaw impeachment proceedings, among other duties. He said he would not have considered interruption as an impeachable offense.
Additionally, Kwak said he felt as if he didn’t disagree much with the Black Student Union. He said his ultimate goal was to pass resolutions which can lead to change instead of making statements.
“I just really wish that ASUU, especially with this experience going through this early in the year, I really wish we can become a better collaborative body that is not divided. That only works with one goal to serve our student body whatever their identities are. Whatever the factors are here, just serve everyone in our community,” Kwak said. “We all share one creed, that we’re students of this university, we want to serve our communities and I think from this experience I really wish we could become a better functioning, better understanding body.”
The articles of impeachment will be voted on in the Senate Thursday, Sept. 3.
P • Sep 4, 2020 at 3:28 pm
There are no grounds for impeachment here. He disagreed with a resolution because it was vague. He wanted specifics. Nothing wrong with that. Saying something/someone is racist just because it/they disagrees with you or because you’re offended doesn’t make it so. I’m ashamed with ASUU and how they’re treating Sen. Kwak. I’m in the College of Science (who he represents) and I am happy that he asked for specifics and clarifications.
Brandon • Sep 4, 2020 at 3:06 pm
Revised headline: ASUU behave like fascists, but think it’s okay because they are fighting fascists.
Cancel culture is always bad — try listening to your opposition.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1quqbkm9RrtOLQda7i17JQMSRSVS5XO3g
The list of assertions “whereas” are very biased. Some are fair, some are extreme left-wing, and highly subjectively possibly incorrect.
The list of requirements have some things that are probably fine (not knowing the deeper details), but have a lot of things that are just bizarre.
Before quoting statistics, try taking a class in statistics. Anybody can makeup correlations, it doesn’t make them real.
A few suggestions to bring the document down to reality:
1. I would suggest that the % of ANY minority at a given university should reflect the % of their “market” of students — those who will come in. If it is found that the general % of addressable marketable students is imbalanced with the % of who’s actually attending, then you should look into why that is and try to remedy things. But just because there is a group represented by some percentage doesn’t mean anything — good or bad. Context is everything.
2. When it comes to marketing material, requiring payment for one race and not another is… racist. Why not just require a balanced representation of races in marketing material? Pay being … irrelevant and driven by the market?
N • Sep 3, 2020 at 5:13 pm
Could we get more information though?… Based on the information given, it seems like Sen. Kwak was asking questions about policy but was accused of being a racist and threatened to be impeached. As a minority at the U, I would rather have leadership critically question policy that impacts minorities before it is rolled out rather than getting a unanimous vote for policy that is ineffective, superficial, and essentially performative allyship. Again, we need more information before we pass any judgments. However, I don’t see the purpose of this article if it doesn’t give us all the information behind the situation.
John • Sep 3, 2020 at 3:53 pm
How shameful of the students to impeach a fellow member for opposing a racist, entitled resolution that violates the free speech of conservatives and whites. Too bad the University of Utah is adopting the bigotry going on in the nation right now.
John Smith • Sep 3, 2020 at 3:51 pm
How shameful of the students to impeach a fellow member for opposing a racist, entitled resolution that violates the free speech of conservatives and whites. Too bad the University of Utah is adopting the bigotry going on in the nation right now.
Lexi Hoggan • Sep 3, 2020 at 2:55 pm
Really difficult to understand what the grounds of impeachment are when Sen. Tiffany Chan and Sen. Jessica Wojciechowski are accusing Seodam of “things”. How would accusing someone of saying “things” hold up in the court of law? A follow-up article on concrete evidence would be nice.
The Truth • Sep 3, 2020 at 1:02 pm
It should speak volumes that the “offense” isn’t mentioned at all. Just sounds like another “he offended me” claim with no merit. Clown world.
Tyler Hudgins • Sep 3, 2020 at 12:10 pm
As a University of Utah alumnus, I am ashamed at the thought that my former school’s government would feel the need to remove someone from office simply for disagreeing. Disagreement is not a form of dismissal nor is it a reason to not feel safe. We need to be open to discussion and debate as it builds stronger and longer-lasting ideas.
If your position can not handle being critiqued or receiving criticism from others, it is not worth holding.
Ale • Sep 2, 2020 at 4:45 pm
I think that moving to impeach someone because they raised legitimate concerns and questions is an attack on free speech itself. Great ideas are formed from constructive conversations. Kwak was representing students who do have questions about the resolution and the future impacts that it will have on all students. Why are students in ASUU if they are not willing to DISCUSS items and find resolutions and use forward-thinking to find resolutions and weigh potential issues in the future. The article shouldn’t be rushed to be involved with a movement, but rather be well thought out and constructed to support and help students for more than just a short period of time.
Greg Piper • Sep 1, 2020 at 6:37 pm
This article does not state what he allegedly did that offended people, other than “interrupting.” Is that really it? You’ve leaving some details out. Doesn’t help readers.