‘Queen Charlotte’: A Strange but Enjoyable Series

Queen+Charlotte+Poster+%28Courtesy+of+Netflix%29

“Queen Charlotte” Poster (Courtesy of Netflix)

By Edie Raines, Copy Editor

 

Netflix’s “Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story,” the latest addition to the now famous “Bridgerton” universe, has become one of Netflix’s most popular shows yet. The mini series allows audiences a sneak peak into the juvenile love lives of some of “Bridgerton’s” elder characters and sparks questions about romance and sexuality as we get older.

Historical Inaccuracies and their (Lack of) Consequence

I’ve found myself rather unwittingly enthralled by each season, and each respective love match, that “Bridgerton” has presented so far. While many have been put off by the historical anachronisms and flagrant sexuality that is so uncommon in period pieces (but is ever-present in shows by TV icon Shonda Rhimes), the classical covers of modern hits and very inaccurate but very beautiful clothing choices feel to me much more akin to Sofia Coppola‘s “Marie Antoinette” than Netflix’s “Persuasion” — by which I mean the decision to change history feels much more like a campy creative choice than an annoying error.

That being said, it was a little strange to realize that the love interest in “Queen Charlotte” was the same King George that ruled during the Revolutionary War. No one expects a series about young women learning what masturbation is to accurately portray an important historical figure and I found myself constantly distracted by the bizarre choice to not simply make up a fictional king.

The portrayal of King George’s mental illness was another distracting aspect. Though men putting themselves through hell to be good enough for their lovers may sound romantic in theory, the literal torture scenes were bizarre and not quite in good taste. It felt like a very outdated portrayal of mental health, out of touch with the current climate.

Moms Like to Have Sex Too!

That being said, “Queen Charlotte” was not entirely socially irresponsible. The original series rarely addressed the relative racial equality that exists in their AU London. However, “Queen Charlotte” confronts those issues head-on, dealing with colorism, generational wealth and the fight for equality.

The show simultaneously depicts the sexuality of mature women in a way that was admittedly a bit awkward but undoubtedly important. We are so used to seeing men over 40 years old being sexual, typically with much younger women. The same situation for women is nothing but taboo. “Queen Charlotte” allows the older female characters to express sexual desire. Violet Bridgerton and Lady Danbury (Ruth Gemmell and Adjoa Andoh respectively) depict sexuality past the supposed expiration date for women, and even after the passing of a beloved husband.

To Binge or Not to Binge

“Queen Charlotte” is a strange show. Though the casting of the younger versions of characters was nothing short of incredible, and there was some very good spice for those who enjoy it, the show was slow and came to an awkward end, largely due to the strange portrayal of real-world issues. If you enjoyed the other seasons, you’ll probably love it! But if you’re not already waiting for Colin and Penelope in season 3, you might want to sit this one out.

 

[email protected] 

@ed_edd_n_edie