The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony

Letter to the Editor: What We Owe to Each Other, an Open Letter to President Taylor Randall

Make it clear that, whatever YAF may believe, transgender students are allowed in public bathrooms, allowed on this campus and that the university will protect and support us no matter what.
The+Block+U+on+the+University+of+Utah+Campus+in+Salt+Lake+City%2C+Utah+on+July+12%2C+2017.
Adam Fondren
The Block U on the University of Utah Campus in Salt Lake City, Utah on July 12, 2017. (Photo by Adam Fondren | Daily Utah Chronicle)

Dear President Taylor Randall,

As you are surely aware, the Utah Board of Higher Education approved a resolution recently that mandates public institutions to establish policies which, among other things, protect institutional neutrality, free speech on campus, and those students who exercise that right. The resolution itself was non-specific in regards to what qualifies as “neutrality;” however, political commentary regarding the resolution is deeply worrying. When asked about whether universities should acknowledge things such as LGBTQ pride month, House Speaker Mike Schultz made his position abundantly clear by saying, “No, they shouldn’t. That should be left up to the students.”

As a transgender student at the University of Utah, I must warn you that to take such a restrictive view of the university’s neutrality would not only lead to the inevitable silencing of protected speech, but also undermine the core mission of the university. The U has, both legally and morally, a responsibility to protect free speech on its campus. This, despite my disgust in those participating, includes the anti-trans hate speech disseminated by the Young Americans for Freedom. Several members of Mecha have been criminally charged — including counts of Class B misdemeanors and infractions — after police said they stormed and protested a YAF event where they planned to screen the movie “Damaged.” The trans community and its allies will uphold their responsibility to MECHA, its leadership, and all others who make sacrifices for our safety. We will support them in their fight against campus leadership and against prosecution suffered in our defense.

What troubles me most is not which actions the university took in these matters, nor the hateful rhetoric of YAF; it is that the U continues to grievously fail in its responsibility to the trans community. In my three plus years as a student at this university, I cannot speak to any period during which I felt safe or supported on campus. Recent episodes paint trans hate on campus as a transient phenomenon — it isn’t, nor is the university’s utter disregard for trans safety. The trans community remains alienated both on and off campus — constantly afraid of harassment, discrimination, and violence. When the university does indicate support for the trans community, it almost always feels performative or incentivized by PR interests. It doesn’t matter how many times you decorate the Block U with the pride flag — if you won’t stand up for the safety of marginalized students on campus, then you are failing in your role. The university’s mandate regarding YAF is clear, but so too is its mandate regarding the trans community.

The U’s mission statement (the very same found on your website) claims to “[F]oster student success by preparing students from diverse backgrounds for lives of impact as leaders and citizens.” Part of that mission is to make sure that these “diverse” students feel safe enough to use the bathrooms, go to class, walk across campus, and ride Trax. In fact, the very resolution from UBHE commands you to “provide a process for an institution to publicly address, condemn, or prohibit expression … that is directly incompatible with our institutions’ ability to achieve their primary missions or pedagogical objectives.” We are a part of that primary mission. Considering the record the U has on public safety in recent years, it’s frankly shocking that you seem to have forgotten that.

I understand that you are required to protect YAF’s right to speak hatefully, but you are also required to protect this university’s students, including trans students. You don’t have to silence YAF to do so, nor would it really be prudent to. Instead, make as clear a statement about student safety as you have about free speech. Counter hateful posters with forceful, far-reaching, and genuine reaffirmation of trans students’ right to be here. Make it clear that, whatever YAF may believe, we’re allowed in public bathrooms, we’re allowed on this campus and that the university will protect and support us no matter what. You may try to claim that the U is already doing so. My answer: I can’t hear you! How will you know when you’ve succeeded in that messaging? I’ll tell you. The trans community will tell you.

-U student Eliza Diggins

View Comments (7)

Comments (7)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy here.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • J

    John HedbergDec 20, 2023 at 8:30 pm

    Just to reiterate,
    You do see why there’s a public perception that articles your staff disagrees with seem to have a very hard time being aired, don’t you? Your staff banned me for almost a year for the “dangerous speech” of complimenting a photo. Along with the recent attempt to declare further “policy violations” for comments that violated nothing, comments are now “disappearing”.

    I’d say your institutional credibility has a bit of a problem at this point, wouldn’t you? 😂😎

    Cheerful Regards,
    J Hedberg

    Reply
  • J

    John HedbergDec 18, 2023 at 2:46 am

    It’s telling me “duplicate comment detected”, and yet the original comment I submitted hasn’t been posted yet 2 days later. Why is that, Friends? 😎😋

    Reply
    • A

      Andrew ChristiansenDec 18, 2023 at 10:58 am

      Hi John, we don’t currently have any pending or unposted comments from you on this piece; it’s possible there was a website error and the submission failed but feel free to resubmit. Thank you.

      Reply
      • J

        John HedbergDec 18, 2023 at 11:15 am

        It’s still telling me “duplicate comment detected”, which seems to indicate that your system does have my original submission, or how could it know the 2nd attempt (or the 3rd, or the 4th) was a duplicate?

        Last time my comments didn’t appear (last week), you told me you were refusing to post my comment for a policy violation you never defined (See comments for “Chloe Cole Speaks at the U), but you later posted my comments anyway using the original submission time-stamp, which is not exactly the transparency students hope for in a student news organization paid for by student fees. Believe it or not, it raises questions about your honesty when you don’t tell the truth about policy violations or when you post a comment with a timestamp that’s different from when you actually posted the comment. It makes it appear you’re trying to hide some lie or hypocrisy for some reason; do you see why?

        Got any comment (mine or yours)?
        Cheerfully,
        J Hedberg

        Reply
        • A

          Andrew ChristiansenDec 18, 2023 at 6:58 pm

          Thanks for your note, John. As of right now, I don’t see any other comments of yours on this story (published, pending, or deleted). I’m sorry that it’s not letting you submit your comment because it’s flagging it as a duplicate. It might be a system error of some sort with our website. I reached out to SNO, who hosts our site and they said “comments typically need to be identical to receive that message. It could happen if the commenter submitted the comment, but it looked like they hadn’t (site timed out, etc.) and they pushed the submit button again.” If you send over your comment you tried to submit, SNO can double check that it wasn’t received/something else is wrong. If you choose to, please send it via email to [email protected].

          Sorry for the confusion on your comment last week – we decided that it did not break our comment policy and went forth with publishing it. There is no way for me to change the time stamp of a comment because that time stamp is meant to show other readers when the comment was submitted, not the exact time it was published.

          Thank you.

          Reply
          • J

            John HedbergDec 18, 2023 at 7:37 pm

            I just submitted the same comment on a freshly updated page, and I received the same “duplicate” message.

            You do see why there’s a public perception that articles your staff disagrees with seem to have a very hard time being aired, don’t you? Your staff banned me for almost a year for the “dangerous speech” of complimenting a photo. Along with the recent attempt to declare further “policy violations” for comments that violated nothing, comments are now “disappearing”.

            I’d say your institutional credibility has a bit of a problem at this point, wouldn’t you? 😂😎

            Cheerful Regards,
            J Hedberg

          • A

            Andrew ChristiansenDec 19, 2023 at 8:59 am

            I’m sorry to hear you’re having issues submitting a comment on this story – I’m honestly not sure what is happening because I don’t see any pending comments on my end. And it looks like making comments on other stories is working. I’m in contact with SNO right now to see what is wrong with our website/comments on this specific story so that they or I can fix it.

            On a different note, we apologize for any delay in posting comments in the past, however as students it sometimes takes us a day or two before we have time to read through long comments to verify they follow our policy before they are posted. Thank you for your understanding.