There are people who don't mislead customers and still make a large profit doing summer sales. But do you really want to sign up for a summer of working in an industry that has become saturated with claims of deception, poor workmanship and lack of stability?

Although our inclination is to support the Sustainable Campus Initiative, ASUU needs to fill these holes and provide detailed plans on future project goals before it deserves the students' money and trust.

I would like to thank The Chronicle for publishing the following correction Jan. 30 for John Hannon's column ("U's printing rates are unreasonable," Jan. 29), which incorrectly stated that the University Print and Copy Services is responsible for campus printing prices.

Although programs are in place to help, we as a community need to help give them a sense of belonging. We need to reach out to our vanished peers. Our help and general awareness toward now college-aged foster children coming out of the system could mean the difference between a successful transition to adulthood and another homeless statistic.

Any bills dealing with safer driving should focus on the actual driver's education and preparation. Improving the driving test and making the driver's license procedure more effective would yield better results.

Students living in on-campus housing should have every protection. Anything less could prove to be an absolute disaster for someone who has done little or nothing wrong.

The bill should also apply only to those beyond the jurisdiction of U discipline. Using a technicality to ban "disruptive" students from campus would be overkill. Student discipline should be dictated by existing laws and U policies.

As the budget crisis gets worse, and it seems likely it will, tough choices have to be made. Will Young and Betz make a small sacrifice for the good of the many? Sure, giving up private residential snow removal won't solve the larger problem the facilities management department is facing, but small symbolic gestures such as this would at least indicate that these men have their priorities straight.

Utah Legislators would do well to realize the benefits of this bill. It is protecting the reliability of the procedure that put them in office in the first place. The Legislature should not allow a dangerous loophole to be taken advantage of before enacting legislation to prevent it.

Rasmussen wound up his testimony by stating: "Far from being the least offensive bill in Equality Utah's gay rights "initiative,' S.B. 32 is actually the most offensive in our opinion8212;it represents an insidious legal construct in search of a clever cause looking for an existing remedy. In other words, S.B. 32 is not only not needed, it invites legal mischief in areas of marriage and family that most Utahns oppose." As such it is good that the committee rejected the bill.