The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony

Cartoon was offensive, no matter what Chronicle says

Editor:Like many others, I was mildly offended by the cartoon advertising activities based on perceptions of the LDS Church. I hoped that similar to the offenses felt by the Black Student Union and MEChA, the ones directed toward my church were unintentional. Thus I was very disappointed by the corresponding editorials not only justifying the cartoon, but bemoaning the fact that such offense was taken in the first place.

Yes, I understand that we have a Constitutional right to express any thought or idea in a public forum (thanks for reminding me though, Lindsey Sine).?Furthermore, I agree with Matt Patton that many people often react unduly to truly innocuous statements. However, the thing I found most disturbing was the idea that the solution to such problems was simply not to think.

To quote Patton, “It seems that before speaking, acting, writing or moving, we have to think?” Oh no. We have to think, ladies and gentlemen. I don’t know about you guys, but I am spending thousands of dollars every semester to learn how to think. Even more discouraging was the later comment, “It is up to those that could take offense to understand that not every person can identify and comprehend what his or her life is all about, and therefore they shouldn’t allow themselves to be offended.”

I would like to remind Sine and Patton that the country providing them the right to express their opinions was based on taking offense. The early colonists of the Revolutionary War were offended that they had to pay taxes without representation. Rosa Parks was offended by laws directed at subjugating her race. One could argue that the recent victory of the Democratic Party in the House of Representatives and the Senate acts as a result of the American people being offended at the actions of the current administration.

Yes, we have the right to say what we want in a public forum. However, we also have the right, and possibly the duty, to remain offended when that right is abused to promote ends that as Sine noted were “insensitive.” I would encourage Sine and Patton to continue expressing their opinions, but please remember that I, too, will maintain my right to be offended. At least I know I am in good company.

Stephanie NielsonJunior, History Education

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy here.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *