The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

The University of Utah's Independent Student Voice

The Daily Utah Chronicle

Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony
Print Issues
Write for Us
Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor, send us an op-ed pitch or check out our open positions for the chance to be published by the Daily Utah Chronicle.
@TheChrony

ASUU president vetoes Clark bill

By Nicollo Barber, Staff Writer

ASUU President Patrick Reimherr vetoed a bill Tuesday that would have allocated almost $570 to the campaign group Students for Garrett Clark.

U alumnus Garrett Clark is the Republican candidate for the House District 25 seat in the Utah State Legislature. Members of the student group backing his campaign asked the Associated Students of the University of Utah General Assembly for funding Sept. 30 in hopes that they could use the money to organize a voter awareness event, which they said would be completely bipartisan and would include Christine Johnson, Clark’s Democratic opponent.

After an extended debate, the Assembly passed the bill under the condition that the student group remove all campaign propaganda from the party.

Critics of the bill quickly pointed out that money was being appropriated to a student group affiliated with a political candidate, which would not only contradict ASUU’s constitution, Redbook, but jeopardize the U’s nonprofit status as well.

“It’s against the law for a nonprofit to donate to a political campaign,” Reimherr said. “The U could lose its non-profit status, which would really hurt this institution.”

With that in mind, Reimherr vetoed the bill before it could go any further.

“I could have let it pass and let it go to the ASUU Supreme Court because it’s unconstitutional,” Reimherr said. “But I decided to circumvent that process and veto it.”

Now that the bill has been vetoed, it will be reintroduced to the Assembly, which can attempt to pass the bill again or simply leave it be.

The Clark campaign will not push the bill any further. Clark’s campaign manager, Andy Murphy, said the campaign urged the student group to not accept the funding shortly after the bill initially passed.

“Patrick (Reimherr) called the weekend after the bill passed after he had spoken with U administrators who advised him the bill was a bad idea,” Murphy said. “At that point we decided not to risk damaging the U.”

Without funding from the bill, the student group will be unable to host the event.

“We’re simply relying on traditional campaigning now,” Murphy said.

He said the Clark campaign is supportive of the veto and understands that it is best for the school.

Although the U is not legally allowed to fund student groups affiliated with candidates, it can fund issue-oriented political groups, such as College Democrats or College Republicans. For this reason, the Assembly has not funded the group Students for Obama.

“The main difference is that those organizations are focused on issues,” Reimherr said. “They promote platforms and ideologies. Their groups will be around after Election Day, whereas Students for Garrett Clark or Students for Barack Obama will not.”

[email protected]

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

The Daily Utah Chronicle welcomes comments from our community. However, the Daily Utah Chronicle reserves the right to accept or deny user comments. A comment may be denied or removed if any of its content meets one or more of the following criteria: obscenity, profanity, racism, sexism, or hateful content; threats or encouragement of violent or illegal behavior; excessively long, off-topic or repetitive content; the use of threatening language or personal attacks against Chronicle members; posts violating copyright or trademark law; and advertisement or promotion of products, services, entities or individuals. Users who habitually post comments that must be removed may be blocked from commenting. In the case of duplicate or near-identical comments by the same user, only the first submission will be accepted. This includes comments posted across multiple articles. You can read more about our comment policy here.
All The Daily Utah Chronicle Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *